⚠️ This is a fork of the huggingface evaluate library's implementation of perplexity.
Out of the box, Pico supports evaluating on Paloma, a comprehensive evaluation benchmark for large language models (LLMs) that focuses on measuring perplexity across diverse text domains. We use the perplexity metric in this space to compute perplexity on Paloma.
Given a model and an input text sequence, perplexity measures how likely the model is to generate the input text sequence.
As a metric, it can be used to evaluate how well the model has learned the distribution of the text it was trained on.
In this case, model_id
should be the trained model to be evaluated, and the input texts should be the text that the model was trained on.
This implementation of perplexity is calculated with log base e
, as in perplexity = e**(sum(losses) / num_tokenized_tokens)
, following recent convention in deep learning frameworks.
Any language generation task.
The metric takes a list of text as input, as well as the name of the model used to compute the metric:
from evaluate import load
perplexity = load("pico-lm/perplexity")
results = perplexity.compute(predictions=predictions, model_id='gpt2')
cuda
when availableThis metric outputs a dictionary with the perplexity scores for the text input in the list, and the average perplexity. If one of the input texts is longer than the max input length of the model, then it is truncated to the max length for the perplexity computation.
{'perplexities': [8.182524681091309, 33.42122268676758, 27.012239456176758], 'mean_perplexity': 22.871995608011883}
The range of this metric is [0, inf). A lower score is better.
Calculating perplexity on predictions defined here:
perplexity = evaluate.load("perplexity", module_type="metric")
input_texts = ["lorem ipsum", "Happy Birthday!", "Bienvenue"]
results = perplexity.compute(model_id='gpt2',
add_start_token=False,
predictions=input_texts)
print(list(results.keys()))
>>>['perplexities', 'mean_perplexity']
print(round(results["mean_perplexity"], 2))
>>>646.75
print(round(results["perplexities"][0], 2))
>>>32.25
Calculating perplexity on predictions loaded in from a dataset:
perplexity = evaluate.load("perplexity", module_type="metric")
input_texts = datasets.load_dataset("wikitext",
"wikitext-2-raw-v1",
split="test")["text"][:50]
input_texts = [s for s in input_texts if s!='']
results = perplexity.compute(model_id='gpt2',
predictions=input_texts)
print(list(results.keys()))
>>>['perplexities', 'mean_perplexity']
print(round(results["mean_perplexity"], 2))
>>>576.76
print(round(results["perplexities"][0], 2))
>>>889.28
Note that the output value is based heavily on what text the model was trained on. This means that perplexity scores are not comparable between models or datasets.
See Meister and Cotterell, "Language Model Evaluation Beyond Perplexity" (2021) for more information about alternative model evaluation strategies.
@article{jelinek1977perplexity,
title={Perplexity—a measure of the difficulty of speech recognition tasks},
author={Jelinek, Fred and Mercer, Robert L and Bahl, Lalit R and Baker, James K},
journal={The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America},
volume={62},
number={S1},
pages={S63--S63},
year={1977},
publisher={Acoustical Society of America}
}